Thursday, June 2, 2011

Superconference shuffle - Setting the Stage

The summer of 2010 was an exciting one for fans of college football. We very nearly saw the complete collapse of one of the 6 BCS Auto-Qualifier conference and the creation of at least one 16 team super conference. For a good roundup of the moves and intrigue check out this wikipedia article. For now it looks like everything will settle in for 2012 as follows (although the WAC may still add a few members, likely 1-AA teams, and there are rumors the Big East would move up to 10 team inviting Villanova to move up to 1-A in football). Teams which changed conferences are in bold below.

BCS AQ Conferences

Pac 12 Big 12 Big Ten SEC ACC Big East
Arizona Baylor Illinois Alabama BC Cincinatti
ASU Iowa State Indiana Arkansas Clemson Lousiville
Cal K State Iowa Auburn Duke Pitt
Colorado Kansas Michigan Florida FSU Rutgers
Oregon Missourri Michigan State Georgia Georgia Tech Syracuse
Oregon State OK State Minnesotta Kentucky Maryland TCU
Stanford Oklahoma Nebraska LSU Miami Uconn
UCLA Texas Northwestern Mississippi NC State USF
USC Texas AM Ohio State Miss State UNC W Virginia
Utah Texas Tech Penn State South Carolina Virginia
Washington Purdue Tennessee Virginia Tech
WSU Wisconsin Vanderbilt Wake Forest



Non-AQ Conferences

MWC WAC C-USA Sun Belt MAC Independent
Air Force Idaho ECU Ark State Akron Army
Boise State L Tech Houston FAU Ball State BYU
Colorado St. New Mexico Marshall FIU BGSU Navy
Fresno State San Jose State Memphis MTSU Buffalo Notre Dame
Hawaii Texas State Rice North Texas C Mich
Nevada UT-San Antonio SMU S Alabama E Mich
New Mex State Utah State So Miss Troy Kent State
SDSU Tulane UL Lafyette Miami (OH)
UNLV Tulsa UL Monroe NIU
Wyoming UAB W Kentucky Ohio
UCF Toledo
UTEP W Mich



Ok, got all that? Good, but don't be too excited because it may not last long. A number of factors still exist that could cause conference re-alignment to come up again before we reach a good stable state. Three conferences in particular would seem to be on shaky ground.

First and most obvious is the WAC. After its attempt to poach teams from the Mountain West backfired, the WAC is looking more like the WEAK. Already they are bolstering their football ranks with a team who is just starting a football program (UT-San Antonio) and a 1-AA program (Texas State). It's likely any new teams that join would similarly be stepping up from the lower sub-division. To put it bluntly the WAC is a few more defections away from being a de-facto 1-AA conference. It's no secret that Louisiana Tech is interested in joining Conference USA and would probably jump given the chance. Meanwhile Utah State is a potential expansion target for the Mountain West. The WAC is struggling to keep its head above water, and this analysis by Zach Bloxham over at The Upset Blog highlights how low attendance is for those schools.

Second we have the Big East. Although a powerhouse in basketball (where its already a super conference with 17 members) its football slate is weak. Many feel its inclusion as a BCS AQ conference is unwarranted and a holdover from past football glory of departed members. They Big East reached out in desperation to TCU to bolster its ranks despite the Horned Frogs not being geographic fit. It wouldn't be the first time the Big East has had to deal with the consequences of conference re-allignment either. In the 2004-2005 cycle three of the strongest Big East teams left for the ACC and the Big East had to add in new teams then, teams which so far haven't lived up to the level set by departing members. During the past summer a number of teams were rumored as possible candidates for future expansion by the Big Ten (Rutgers, Pitt, Syracuse) and the ACC could come calling again if other conferences move up to 16.

Finally we come to the Big 12. This is a conference thats on shaky ground. A last minute deal struck that gives particular favor to the Texas Longhorns does nothing to solve the friction that cause schools like Colorado and Nebraska to seek greener pastures. Texas A&M was rumored to have interest in the SEC, a move that would allow it to differentiate itself from Texas and step out of the shadow of its bitter rival. With the money that the Pac-12 schools will be seeing from their recently re-negotiated media deal (divided equally among all members) you have to imagine a few of the schools that were approached to join the Pac-10 and form the Pac-16 have to be questioning their decision. It might not take much to crack the thin ties binding this conference together and the four northern schools, who were willing to concede money to other members for their remaining in the Big 12, who were likely to be left out of any major expansion scenarios might not be so lucky next time around.

So there we have it, an unstable equilibrium ready to crack and cause a cascade that will reshape major college football like never before. Next time we'll take a look at a few ways such changes would likely shake out.

2 comments:

  1. Good point on the new Pac-12 television contract giving the Big 12 teams who said "Thank but no Thanks" to the Pac-16 second thoughts. Will be interesting to see how long the Big 12 brand remains intact. Texas A&M is the key.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The media deal would have been even more lucrative with Texas and Oklahoma involved too. Plus division splits would have been simpler. Pac-8 schools in the West, Big-12 + AZ schools + Utah (if A&M opted for the SEC) in the East.

    ReplyDelete